Is Komdigi Helping Spread of Online Gambling in Indonesia?

erika ramen
0
Explore controversial role of Komdigi in Indonesia’s online gambling crisis. Is Ministry truly fighting digital crime, or are internal actors accelerating spread of online gambling? Read a critical analysis here.

Indonesia has been waging an uphill battle against online gambling (judi online) for years. On surface, Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs (Komdigi) has positioned itself as frontline defender blocking millions of websites and taking down countless accounts linked to gambling. But beneath this official narrative, troubling reports have surfaced: some insiders may have played a role in keeping gambling platforms alive. This contradiction sparks a critical question is Komdigi helping to stop online gambling, or indirectly fueling its circulation?

By official accounts, Komdigi has removed millions of URLs related to gambling, alongside working with banks to freeze suspicious financial transactions. Every press release paints ministry as proactive, tireless, and committed to protecting citizens from predatory platforms. To public, this looks like a strong shield. But as always, numbers don’t tell whole story.

Investigations revealed disturbing details:
  • Several Komdigi employees were arrested for allegedly accepting payments to allow gambling sites to remain online.
  • Reports suggest that staff were “maintaining” or even “protecting” thousands of gambling platforms in exchange for billions of rupiah.
  • Instead of shutting doors, insiders may have been leaving windows open for industry to thrive.

These revelations turned ministry’s image upside down. How can same institution that claims to block gambling also have employees accused of facilitating it?

Corruption is rarely about individuals alone. Allegations against Komdigi staff expose systemic weaknesses:

  • Lack of transparent auditing in site blocking processes.
  • Over centralized power that allows a handful of employees to control what gets blocked or unblocked.
  • Weak enforcement mechanisms, meaning staff misconduct can flourish under radar.

This makes Komdigi not just a victim of rogue employees but also an institution vulnerable to abuse.

Framing Komdigi as mastermind or “dalang” behind online gambling is complex. Officially, ministry fights against it. But practically, misconduct of insiders has undeniably “helped” gambling networks circulate. By failing to fully prevent corruption and safeguard systems, Komdigi indirectly provides fertile ground for gambling operations.

Do you think digital regulators in Indonesia are doing enough to fight online gambling or are they part of problem? Join conversation and read more critical insights into digital policy and cyber issues at Dark OSINT.

Post a Comment

0Comments

Post a Comment (0)